Skip to content
Trust & Safety

Truth through
transparency.

Witness does not ask users to trust one opaque score. Reports move through visible confidence states using corroboration, flags, source history, and review context.

Report Trust Tiers

Every report has
a trust status.

Unverified

Default state for all new reports. The report has been submitted but not yet corroborated by other users.

Corroborated

At least 10 independent users have confirmed this report from the same location. High confidence.

Verified

An admin or institutional partner has independently verified this report. Highest tier of trust.

!
Disputed

Multiple users have flagged this report. Under community review. Context is attached visibly.

Verification Process

Community-driven
verification.

01

Report Submitted

A user submits a geotagged report with text, photo, and category. It appears on the map immediately as "unverified".

02

Community Corroboration

Other users in the area can corroborate the report. Each corroboration increases the report's trust signal.

03

Trust Threshold

At 10+ corroborations from distinct users, the report automatically moves to "corroborated" tier. The original reporter earns +5 trust score.

04

Flagging & Dispute

If 5+ distinct users flag a report, it's automatically marked "disputed". Context from both sides is visible. Admins review the queue.

05

Admin Review

Admins can verify reports independently, dismiss flags, or take action. All moderation is transparent, never silent deletion.

User Trust Scores

Reputation built
on accuracy.

0 - New20 - Reporter50 - Trusted75 - Verified
Report corroborated by another user+5
Admin manually verifies report+3
Admin actions a flag on your content-5
Report marked as Disputed-10
Abuse Resistance

Hard cases are part of the product, not footnotes.

A real-time public record will attract manipulation attempts. Witness treats hostile behavior as a first-order design constraint.

Coordinated false reports

Distinct corroborators, source history, location/time consistency, and flag velocity are exposed before a report gains confidence.

Doxxing and source safety

Public coordinates are softened, identity modes separate display identity from internal accountability, and sensitive media requires review paths.

State actor pressure

Moderation decisions should be logged with visible reasons, appeals, and preserved context instead of silent deletion.

Viral misinformation

Feeds are chronological and map-native. Disputed context stays attached to the event instead of disappearing into replies.

Moderation Philosophy

Transparency over
suppression.

No Silent Deletion

Content is never quietly removed. Disputed content is flagged with visible context. Users see why something is disputed.

Soft Delete Only

Even when content is removed, the record exists. No hard deletes. Transparency in every action.

Community First

The community flags and corroborates. Admins review. Algorithms never decide what you see. Chronological feeds only.

Reporter Safety

GPS coordinates are never shown publicly. Only reverse-geocoded location names. Identity modes protect contributors.

No Facial Recognition

Ever. Under any circumstances. This is a non-negotiable principle of the platform.

Accountable Identity

No truly anonymous posting. Identity modes provide privacy while maintaining internal accountability.

FAQ

How verification and safety work.

Common questions about how Witness verifies reports, builds trust tiers, and resists misinformation and abuse.

How does Witness verify eyewitness reports?

Witness verifies reports through corroboration from other people on the ground, public flagging, and transparent trust tiers. Reports begin unverified and move through visible states as evidence accumulates, so reliability is shown rather than asserted.

What are trust tiers on Witness?

Trust tiers are visible levels that reflect how much corroboration and credibility a report or contributor has earned. They let readers and newsrooms judge reliability at a glance while keeping the underlying evidence transparent.

How does Witness handle misinformation and abuse?

Witness combines community flagging, corroboration, and transparent moderation to surface accurate reports and demote false ones. Moderation standards are published openly, and decisions can be appealed, rather than relying on silent removal.

Does Witness rank content with an engagement algorithm?

No. Witness deliberately avoids engagement-optimizing ranking. Content is organized around location, time, and evidence, so what surfaces is driven by corroboration and relevance rather than what generates the most clicks.

How does community moderation work on Witness?

The community can publicly flag reports, and those signals feed into transparent trust tiers and moderation review. The goal is resistance to coordinated abuse while keeping the process visible and accountable to contributors.

Evaluate Trust

Review the trust model with us.

If you work in journalism, safety, research, or moderation, request access and help stress-test the verification model before broader release.